All posts tagged 'Breach-Notification-Statutes'
News, commentary and legal updates from the attorneys in the Employee
Defection and Trade Secrets Practice Group at Fisher & Phillips.

Breach Notification Statutes: "Um...We Lost Your Social Security Number"

February 14, 2011 09:00
by Michael R. Greco


Employees take and misuse company information for a variety of reasons.  Some do it because they want to document what they believe to be unlawful conduct.  Others do it because they intend to use it in competition with their soon to be former employers.  Regardless of their motivation, when employees misuse customer information, employers must recognize that such misconduct presents more than simply a competitive or employment concern.  It also may trigger significant obligations under state breach notification laws.

Forty-six states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have enacted legislation requiring companies to notify individuals when there is a security breach involving their personal information.  These laws are the result of an increasing number of breaches involving personally identifiable information.

California’s law is widely recognized as the pioneer, after which a majority of states model their legislation.  Although the common attributes of breach notification laws are discussed in detail below, employers must recognize that the laws vary by state, sometimes in significant ways.  If your company experiences a data breach involving individuals in more than one state, it is imperative that you examine your obligations in each state as they may, and often will, be different and will require cumulative and concurrent action.

Breach notification laws commonly include: (1) A section defining the scope and nature of information covered by the law; (2) A section specifying events and conditions triggering obligations under the law; and (3) A section defining obligations under the law in the event action is required.

Scope and Nature of Information Typically Covered by Breach Notification Laws

Breach notification laws typically require any person or business conducting business within a state to notify individuals if their “personal information” was, or reasonably is, believed to have been acquired by an unauthorized person.  “Personal information” is commonly defined to include an individual’s name combined with a certain “data element” such as a Social Security number, driver’s license number, or account number in combination with any password that would permit access to a person’s account.  In the vast majority of states, the application of breach notification laws is limited to computerized data that contains personal information, and even then, only if the computerized data is unencrypted.  In a small handful of states, breach notification obligations may be implicated if personal information in paper records is the subject of a breach.

Events and Conditions Triggering Breach Notification Obligations

Breach notification laws typically apply if “personal information” is acquired by an unauthorized person or in the event that there is a breach of the security of the system.  A “breach” is considered to have occurred when someone acquires computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality or integrity of personal information.  Many states require action only if the breach creates a heightened risk of harm to an individual such as identity theft, potential fraud or some other type of economic harm.

When and What Type of Notice is Required?

If a company determines that a breach requiring notice has occurred, the questions that arise include when and how must notice be given?  Generally speaking, notice must be given as expeditiously as possible without unreasonable delay, although, notice may be delayed if providing notice would interfere with a law enforcement investigation.  A few states have bright line rules setting forth a specific number of days within which notice must be provided.

Most statutes provide some flexibility concerning the type of notice that must be provided.  Written notice is the standard approach, with many states allowing electronic notice if such notice is provided in a manner consistent with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (commonly known as the E-SIGN Act).  A few state permit telephone notice.

Under certain circumstances, such as breaches involving an unusually large numbers of individuals, or where costs of notification may be beyond the resources of a small business, substitute notice is permitted.  Substitute notice generally requires email notice if possible, conspicuous posting of notice on a company’s website, and notification to a major statewide media outlet.

A handful of states require that notice must also be given to state authorities in addition to those individuals whose information was the subject of a breach.

Surprisingly, most state statutes do not specify exactly what must be stated in notice, however, the states that do so serve as useful guidance.  Generally, they provide that notice must describe the breach incident, the type of personal information that was placed at risk, and the steps that the company has taken to minimize or prevent further risk.  It is also commonly required that notice should include a telephone number that the individual can call with questions or to seek further guidance, as well as a reminder that individuals should exercise diligence in monitoring their accounts and finances such as credit reports to determine whether the breach has resulted in any specific harm.

Practical Steps

In the face of an information security breach, prompt action is required.  Because the scope and nature of a breach cannot likely be determined in advance, companies would be well served to develop response plans.  Response teams should be assembled and consulted, including IT and human resources personnel, and legal counsel.  Teams should be prepared to investigate and ascertain the scope of breaches when they occur.  Investigations should be comprehensive, documented, and expeditious.  And as noted above, the state-specific requirements must be identified and observed.

Michael R. Greco is a partner in the Employee Defection & Trade Secrets Practice Group at Fisher & Phillips LLP.  To receive notice of future blog posts either follow Michael R. Greco on Twitter or on LinkedIn or subscribe to this blog's RSS feed.

Trade Secrets

Personal Information Security Laws Become More Commonplace and Stringent

July 20, 2010 03:15
by Michael R. Greco

In our inaugural issue of the Employee Defection & Trade Secrets Digest, we wrote about state information security laws and how they apply in the employee defection context. (At the bottom of this post, you can obtain a copy of the Digest and read State Information Security Laws: What Are They and What Do They Have To Do With Employee Defection? by James P. McLaughlin)  The passage of time has demonstrated not only that these laws are not going away, they are becoming more commonplace and more stringent.  A recent example includes Massachusetts’ recent regulation entitled “Standards for the Protection of Personal Information of Residents of the Commonwealth.” (201 CMR 17.01(2).  A copy of the Massachusetts’ regulation may be obtained here.)  The regulation applies to businesses that own or license personal information about a resident of Massachusetts.  Personal information is defined to mean a Massachusetts resident’s first name in combination with information that would permit access to their financial account, such as a social security number, driver’s license number, or account number. 

 

The regulation “establishes minimum standards to be met in connection with the safeguarding of personal information contained in both paper and electronic records.”  201 CMR 17.01(1).  Companies are required develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program that contains appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.  Appropriate measures include, but are not limited to the following:

 

· Preventing terminated employees from accessing records containing personal information;

· Designating one or more employees to maintain the comprehensive information security program;

· Identifying and assessing reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the security and confidentiality of personal information; and

· Developing security policies for employees relating to the storage, access and transportation of records containing personal information outside of business premises.

 

The regulation also requires companies to document responsive actions taken in connection with any incident involving a breach of security, and it contains computer system security requirements concerning the storage, transmission and accessing of personal information.  If your company loses an employee, whether in Massachusetts or elsewhere, it may be worth a moment to determine whether a state information security law or regulation is implicated.

Employee Defection & Trade Secrets Digest.pdf (525.57 kb)

Do narrowly tailored non-competes favor or hinder fair competition?

Do narrowly tailored non-competes favor or hinder fair competition?


Show Results

TAG CLOUD

Copyright 2007-2013 Fisher & Phillips LLP disclaimer
navbottom image